I'm asking what is truth in the era of hybrid information wars. Is it truth what looks like the truth and what we believe to be true?

For us, a stone is one that does not change over time. Ancient constructions have preserved to now. Rocks remain the same for millions of years. When we look at a stone, in fact, we are looking at a direct and honest imprint of the past.

On the pages of the book, the same stone is shown in all angles around. The photographic reproduction accuracy is beyond doubt. But if you look closely (as well as wanting and knowing what to look at) you can see something exceptional. These are subtle 3d glitches and shape changes. The stone is generated.

As a consequence, the viewer has few questions. First, when reads the thesis on the cover. It's inconsistent with the photographic documentary inside the book. Secondly, when he/she questions the existence of this stone. Third, when the reader is asked to formulate his own position at the end of the book.

Sasha Bychenko